His arrival in Helsinki is important for two reasons. They use a memo from Lou Ivon to Garrison saying that he could not find anyone to inform them of this fact. Apparently, some asshole wants to use my name as an alias. What I'm proudest of and spent more time working on than anything else are my contributions to Lee Harvey Oswald. With hyperbole worthy of a lawyer, namely Vincent Bugliosi, McAdams writes that the evidence linking Oswald to this weapon is "overwhelming". Another source he uses is Dave Reitzes.
Even though he was a radar operator.
But indefatigable Wiki critic Daniel Brandt found out who Gamaliel really was. I mention this because it may help explain the origins of the associate professor's quite conservative political philosophy. Therefore if the Dallas application said the same, why would it be discarded? I hint at doing a second part and he seems non-committal so I take it as an affirmative. The book title can probably be taken literally since the assassination is examined from virtually every angle. We might have never learned about this operation if the perpetrator had used the name of say 'Jack Smith'. You take a sniper's shot at a retired general in his home.